Hill v. State

989 So. 2d 739, 2008 WL 4146688
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 958 So. 2d 549
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 10, 2008·No. 4D07-1015·Published

Opinion

989 So.2d 739 (2008)

Jerry HILL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D07-1015.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

September 10, 2008.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Peggy Natale, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Laura Fisher Zibura, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, the public defender filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We agree that there are no meritorious issues concerning the judgment of conviction and sentence and thus affirm the same. The trial court, though, imposed a public defender's fee without first giving the defendant notice of his right to a hearing to contest the amount. See § 938.29(5), Fla. Stat.; Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.720(d). The public defender's fee is thus stricken. See Mitchell v. State, 789 So.2d 1043 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Norris v. State, 659 So.2d 1352 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). On remand, the fee may be reimposed after the proper procedure is followed. See Ciccia *740 v. State, 854 So.2d 243 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded with instructions.

KLEIN, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. State, 989 So. 2d 739, 2008 WL 4146688 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

989 So. 2d 739 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Ciccia v. State
854 So. 2d 243 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Norris v. State
659 So. 2d 1352 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Mitchell v. State
789 So. 2d 1043 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)