Hill v. State

946 So. 2d 47, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21030, 2006 WL 3615516
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 873 So. 2d 491
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 13, 2006·No. No. 2D06-3248·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Hill appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief and amended motion for postconviction relief filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Hill previously filed a rule 3.850 motion that the postconviction court summarily denied. This court affirmed the postconviction court’s order in Hill v. State, 888 So.2d 635 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (table decision). In the current motions, Hill failed to allege any justification for his failure to raise his new claims in his first rule 3.850 motion. Therefore, we affirm the posteonviction court’s order because Hill’s motions are successive. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(f); Balko v. State, 934 So.2d 662, 663 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, SILBERMAN, and WALLACE, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. State, 946 So. 2d 47, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21030, 2006 WL 3615516 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

946 So. 2d 47 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill v. State
888 So. 2d 635 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Balko v. State
934 So. 2d 662 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)