Hill v. State

820 So. 2d 1049, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9678, 2002 WL 1466429
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 788 So. 2d 315
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 10, 2002·No. No. 2D01-2866·Published

Opinion

BLUE, Chief Judge. •

James Hill appeals his conviction for sale of cocaine within 1000 feet of a place of worship. We address only his issue concerning the jury instructions. Because the trial court failed to instruct the jury on a category one lesser included offense, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

At the charge conference, Mr. Hill’s counsel requested the trial judge to give the jury the standard instruction for possession of cocaine. Although counsel failed to point out to the trial court that the requested instruction was indeed a required category one lesser, counsel did in fact request the instruction. The jury instructions applicable to this case specifically state that possession is a category one lesser of sale of cocaine within 1000 feet of a place of worship.

The State’s argument that the Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases did not intend to include the possession as a category one lesser to sale of cocaine within 1000 feet of a place of worship is without merit. Whether or not the Committee so intended, the Standard Jury Instructions have been adopted by the Florida Supreme Court. In re Standard Jury Instructions-Criminal Cases (99-1), 765 So.2d 692 (Fla.2000).

Accordingly, we reverse Mr. Hill’s conviction and remand for a new trial.

NORTHCUTT and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. State, 820 So. 2d 1049, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9678, 2002 WL 1466429 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

820 So. 2d 1049 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Standard Jury Inst.-Criminal Cases
765 So. 2d 692 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)