Hill v. State

813 So. 2d 274, 2002 WL 537832
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 12, 2002·No. 5D01-3235·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

813 So.2d 274 (2002)

Antowayne D. HILL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D01-3235.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

April 12, 2002.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Jane C. Almy-Loewinger, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Angela D. McCravy, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

ORFINGER, R. B., J.

Antowayne D. Hill appeals the sentence imposed by the trial court following his violation of probation. Hill argues that the trial court should have awarded him credit for the time he spent in a residential drug treatment program as a condition of probation. We disagree. A defendant is not entitled to credit for time served in a drug treatment program. See Aviles v. State, 794 So.2d 734 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Williamson v. State, 765 So.2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

AFFIRMED.

SHARP, W. and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. State, 813 So. 2d 274, 2002 WL 537832 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

813 So. 2d 274 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clifton v. State
931 So. 2d 996 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
White v. State
847 So. 2d 597 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)