Aviles v. State
This text of 794 So. 2d 734 (Aviles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sidney AVILES, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Sidney Aviles, Lake Butler, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
GRIFFIN, J.
Defendant, Sidney Aviles, appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.800(a) motion *735 and his amended Rule 3.800(a) motion. He also filed a motion to construe the prior motions as an emergency petition for writ of habeas corpus, which was denied. We find no basis for relief.
In defendant's Rule 3.800(a) motion, he claims that he is entitled to credit for time served in a drug treatment center. He also claims there were errors on his guideline scoresheet. The trial court correctly denied the claim for credit, relying on Williamson v. State, 765 So.2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), in which the court held that a defendant is not entitled to credit for time served in a drug treatment program. See also Taylor v. State, 726 So.2d 348 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). The trial court also correctly denied the scoresheet error claims as meritless or not cognizable in a Rule 3.800(a) motion. See Mathis v. State, 738 So.2d 414 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 751 So.2d 51 (Fla.1999).
AFFIRMED.
SHARP, W. and ORFINGER, R.B., J.J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
794 So. 2d 734, 2001 WL 1103254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aviles-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.