Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hill v. State

Hill v. State

566 So. 2d 954, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7211, 1990 WL 136867
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 561 So. 2d 1245 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 18, 1990·No. No. 89-2080·Published

Opinion

WOLF, Judge.

The sole issue before the court is whether the split sentences imposed upon appellant violate his constitutional protection against double jeopardy. We affirm. Poore v. State, 531 So.2d 161 (Fla.1988).

WENTWORTH and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. State, 566 So. 2d 954, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7211, 1990 WL 136867 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

566 So. 2d 954 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Poore v. State
531 So. 2d 161 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)