Hill v. State

565 So. 2d 420, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6464, 1990 WL 123104
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 22, 1990·No. No. 89-1732·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BARFIELD, Judge.

As the state concedes, Hill is entitled to credit for earned gain-time upon the imposition of a new sentence for violation of community control. State v. Carter, 553 So.2d 169 (Fla.1989); State v. Green, 547 So.2d 925 (Fla.1989). We reverse on this issue only, and remand with directions to allow credit for all gain-time previously earned. Appellant is not entitled to receive credit for time spent in community control. Swain v. State, 553 So.2d 1331 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

The other issues raised on appeal are without merit.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

ERVIN and JOANOS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. State, 565 So. 2d 420, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6464, 1990 WL 123104 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

565 So. 2d 420 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. State
634 So. 2d 287 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)