Hill v. State
450 So. 2d 250, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12726
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 434 So. 2d 974 →
Opinion
We find the evidence against the defendant so overwhelming as to make the error of admitting a totally irrelevant and arguably prejudicial letter written by him harmless. Accordingly, the judgment under review is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hill v. State, 450 So. 2d 250, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12726 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
450 So. 2d 250 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.