Hill v. State
424 So. 2d 41, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22457
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 1, 1982·No. No. 81-1596·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The judgment and sentence are affirmed. The appellant may apply to the trial court to correct the scrivener’s error regarding the omission from the judgment of the finding that the appellant is a youthful offender. The appellant should have made that application to the trial court before bringing it up on appeal.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hill v. State, 424 So. 2d 41, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22457 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
424 So. 2d 41 (Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
APGAR & MARKHAM CONST. OF FLA., INC. v. MacAsphalt, Inc.
424 So. 2d 41 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)