Hill v. Starkweather

30 Ind. 434
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 30 Ind. 434 (Hill v. Starkweather) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill v. Starkweather, 30 Ind. 434 (Ind. 1868).

Opinion

Ray, C. J.

The appellee moved in the court below to dismiss an appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace, “ for the reason that the transcript of the record shows that the judgment, interest, and costs, were fully paid by said plaintiftj voluntarily, prior to his perfecting the appeal in said cause.”

II. D. Wilson and J. D. Osborn, for appellant. A, S. Make and JR. M. Johnson, for appellee.

This motion was sustained. This was error. Armes v. Chappel, 28 Ind. 469, where the case of Dickensheets v. Kaufman was referred to as authority; but the ease not having been fully reported, it will bo found to decide this question, by a reference to that case in 29 Ind. 154.

The motion to dismiss the appeal should have been ovei’ruled.

The judgment is reversed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McConnell, Admx. v. Thomson, Tr.
3 N.E.2d 986 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1937)
Belton v. Smith
45 Ind. 291 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1873)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Ind. 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-starkweather-ind-1868.