Armes v. Chappel
This text of 28 Ind. 469 (Armes v. Chappel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The appellant sued the appellee before a justice of the peace. Answer, set-off. On the trial there was a finding and judgment for appellee. This judgment was, with the costs, paid; and subsequently, and within thirty days from the trial, an appeal was taken to the Court of Common Pleas. There, a motion to dismiss the appeal, because taken after payment of the judgment and costs, was overruled. An answer was then filed, averring the fact of such payment, and upon a demurrer being overruled to the same, judgment was rendered for the appellee.
In the case of Dickensheets et al. v. Kaufman et al., ante p. 251, we held that payment of a judgment was not a waiver of the right of appeal by the judgment defendant. The demurrer to the answer should have been sustained.
The judgment is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 Ind. 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armes-v-chappel-ind-1867.