Hill v. Rose Electric Co.
This text of 469 S.E.2d 844 (Hill v. Rose Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff Rose Electric Company filed this contract action alleging that defendant Charles Hill was “indebted to Plaintiff on an open [604]*604account which is in default and remains unpaid in the amount of $8,742.94.” Defendant denied the material allegations, and the case was tried before the Superior Court of Henry County without the intervention of a jury. The superior court found for the plaintiff in the principal sum of $4,014 plus costs. From that judgment defendant brings this direct appeal. Held:
OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6) requires an application for discretionary appeal “in all actions for damages in which the judgment is $10,000.00 or less[.]” In the case sub judice, “this final judgment awards contractual damages in an amount less than $10,000.00 and so . . . require[s] an application for discretionary appeal. . . .” English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175). “The [defendant] failed to follow that procedure in this case, and this direct appeal must be dismissed. See Walker v. City of Macon, 166 Ga. App. 228 (303 SE2d 776) (1983).” Simpkins v. Minks, 175 Ga. App. 729 (334 SE2d 340).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
469 S.E.2d 844, 220 Ga. App. 603, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 1233, 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-rose-electric-co-gactapp-1996.