Diana A. Nowlin v. Citibank, N.A.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 11, 2014
DocketA14A1141
StatusPublished

This text of Diana A. Nowlin v. Citibank, N.A. (Diana A. Nowlin v. Citibank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Diana A. Nowlin v. Citibank, N.A., (Ga. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia | ATLANTA,__________________ March 11, 2014

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A14A1141. DIANA A. NOWLIN v. CITIBANK, N.A.

In the underlying action to collect on a credit card debt, the trial court awarded $4,864.92 in principal plus $272.50 in costs to the plaintiff. Defendant Diana A. Nowlin then filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction. The discretionary appeal procedure is required where a money judgment in an action for damages totals $10,000.00 or less. See OCGA § 5-6- 35 (a) (6). Because Nowlin failed to follow the required procedure, her appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Hill v. Rose Electric Co., 220 Ga. App. 603 (469 SE2d 844) (1996).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 03/11/2014 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hill v. Rose Electric Co.
469 S.E.2d 844 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Diana A. Nowlin v. Citibank, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diana-a-nowlin-v-citibank-na-gactapp-2014.