Hill v. Port Authority Transit System

573 A.2d 1026, 524 Pa. 466, 1990 Pa. LEXIS 103
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 9, 1990·No. Appeal Nos. 407 & 408 W.D. Allocatur Dockets 1989·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ORDER OF COURT

PER CURIAM.

Petition and Cross-Petition for Allowance of appeal are granted. The cases are remanded to the Commonwealth Court in light of our recent decision in Marshall v. Port Authority of Allegheny County, 524 Pa. 1, 568 A.2d 931 (1990).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. Port Authority Transit System, 573 A.2d 1026, 524 Pa. 466, 1990 Pa. LEXIS 103 (Pa. 1990).

573 A.2d 1026 (Hill v. Port Authority Transit System) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Woodruff
46 Pa. D. & C.5th 95 (Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas, 2015)
Paravati v. Port Authority of Allegheny County
914 A.2d 946 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)
Gielarowski v. Port Authority
632 A.2d 1054 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1993)
Hill v. Port Authority Transit System
585 A.2d 1129 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1991)