Hill v. Medford

588 S.E.2d 467, 357 N.C. 650

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 5, 2003·No. 389A03·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

588 S.E.2d 467 (2003) 357 N.C. 650

Thomas William HILL
v.
Bobby MEDFORD, Individually and as Sheriff of Buncombe County; and Western Surety Company.

No. 389A03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2003.

*468 Long, Parker, Warren & Jones, P.A., by Robert B. Long, Jr., and W. Scott Jones, Asheville, for defendants-appellants.

Carter & Kropelnicki, P.A., by Steven Kropelnicki, Jr., Asheville, for plaintiff-appellee.

Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, P.L.L.C., by Mark A. Davis, Raleigh, for amicus curiae North Carolina Association of County Commissioners.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

588 S.E.2d 467 (2003) 357 N.C. 650

Thomas William HILL
v.
Bobby MEDFORD, Individually and as Sheriff of Buncombe County; and Western Surety Company.

No. 389A03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2003.

*468 Long, Parker, Warren & Jones, P.A., by Robert B. Long, Jr., and W. Scott Jones, Asheville, for defendants-appellants.

Carter & Kropelnicki, P.A., by Steven Kropelnicki, Jr., Asheville, for plaintiff-appellee.

Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, P.L.L.C., by Mark A. Davis, Raleigh, for amicus curiae North Carolina Association of County Commissioners.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

REVERSED.

Hill v. Medford, 588 S.E.2d 467, 357 N.C. 650 (N.C. 2003).

Pincite

588 S.E.2d 467 (Hill v. Medford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simmons v. Corizon Health, Inc.

122 F. Supp. 3d 255 (M.D. North Carolina, 2015)

Disher v. Weaver

308 F. Supp. 2d 614 (M.D. North Carolina, 2004)