Hill v. McKinley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hill v. McKinley

130 S.E.2d 128, 218 Ga. 680, 1963 Ga. LEXIS 295

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 25, 1963·No. 21943·Published

Opinion

Mobley, Justice.

Where, as here, the only proper assignment of error is on an order of the trial court granting a continuance in a cause pending in that court, no question is presented for a decision by this court. Cartter & Co. v. Rome & Carrollton Constr. Co., 89 Ga. 158 (3) (15 SE 36); See Rivers v. Key, 189 Ga. 832, 833 (2) (7 SE2d 732). Accordingly, the writ of error is hereby

Dismissed.

All the Justices concur. Hugh G. Head, Jr., for plaintiff in error. Dickson Adams, John E. Holliman, Eugene Cook, Attorney General, Earl Hickman, Assistant Attorney General, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mobley, Justice.

Where, as here, the only proper assignment of error is on an order of the trial court granting a continuance in a cause pending in that court, no question is presented for a decision by this court. Cartter & Co. v. Rome & Carrollton Constr. Co., 89 Ga. 158 (3) (15 SE 36); See Rivers v. Key, 189 Ga. 832, 833 (2) (7 SE2d 732). Accordingly, the writ of error is hereby

Dismissed.

All the Justices concur. Hugh G. Head, Jr., for plaintiff in error. Dickson Adams, John E. Holliman, Eugene Cook, Attorney General, Earl Hickman, Assistant Attorney General, contra.

Hill v. McKinley, 130 S.E.2d 128, 218 Ga. 680, 1963 Ga. LEXIS 295 (Ga. 1963).

Pincite

130 S.E.2d 128 (Hill v. McKinley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related