Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Hill v. McKinley

Hill v. McKinley

130 S.E.2d 128, 218 Ga. 680, 1963 Ga. LEXIS 295
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 25, 1963
Docket21943
StatusPublished

This text of 130 S.E.2d 128 (Hill v. McKinley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill v. McKinley, 130 S.E.2d 128, 218 Ga. 680, 1963 Ga. LEXIS 295 (Ga. 1963).

Opinion

Mobley, Justice.

Where, as here, the only proper assignment of error is on an order of the trial court granting a continuance in a cause pending in that court, no question is presented for a decision by this court. Cartter & Co. v. Rome & Carrollton Constr. Co., 89 Ga. 158 (3) (15 SE 36); See Rivers v. Key, 189 Ga. 832, 833 (2) (7 SE2d 732). Accordingly, the writ of error is hereby

Dismissed.

All the Justices concur. Hugh G. Head, Jr., for plaintiff in error. Dickson Adams, John E. Holliman, Eugene Cook, Attorney General, Earl Hickman, Assistant Attorney General, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rivers v. Key
7 S.E.2d 732 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Cartter & Co. v. Rome & Carrollton Construction Co.
89 Ga. 158 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 S.E.2d 128, 218 Ga. 680, 1963 Ga. LEXIS 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-mckinley-ga-1963.