Cartter & Co. v. Rome & Carrollton Construction Co.

89 Ga. 158
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 31, 1892·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

[158] Judgment affirmed.

Dean & Smith, for plaintiffs. W. W. Brookes and W. T. Turnbull, for defendants;.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cartter & Co. v. Rome & Carrollton Construction Co., 89 Ga. 158 (Ga. 1892).

89 Ga. 158 (Cartter & Co. v. Rome & Carrollton Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill v. McKinley
130 S.E.2d 128 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1963)
East Atlanta Bank v. Limbert
12 S.E.2d 865 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Hawkinsville & Western Railroad v. Beckham
93 S.E. 109 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Smith v. Van Hoose
36 S.E. 77 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)