Hill v. HOM/ADE FOODS, INC.

136 F. Supp. 2d 610, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3584, 2001 WL 303531
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hill v. HOM/ADE FOODS, INC.. Read the opinion of the Court — 136 F. Supp. 2d 605
District Court, W.D. Louisiana·Decided March 26, 2001·No. Civ.A. 00-2332·Published

Opinion

ORDER OF REMAND

WALTER, District Judge.

This Court has before it the Defendants’ Appeal of Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne’s Ruling on the Plaintiffs Motion to Remand [Doc. # 19].

After a thorough review of the record in this matter, including this Court’s Order of Remand [Doc. # 16] that was issued pursuant to Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne’s Memorandum Ruling [Doc. # 15], this Court finds that Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne’s Memorandum Ruling [Doc. # 15] was not “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a).

Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendants’ Appeal of Magistrate Judge Payne’s Ruling on the Plaintiffs Motion to Remand [Doc. # 19] should be and hereby is DISMISSED.

Further, IT IS ORDERED that this action be REMANDED to the FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, in and for CADDO PARISH, LOUISIANA.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill v. HOM/ADE FOODS, INC., 136 F. Supp. 2d 610, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3584, 2001 WL 303531 (W.D. La. 2001).

136 F. Supp. 2d 610 (Hill v. HOM/ADE FOODS, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sittig v. Louisville Ladder Group LLC
136 F. Supp. 2d 610 (W.D. Louisiana, 2001)