Hill v. First National Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hill v. First National Bank

118 S.E. 593, 30 Ga. App. 593, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 539

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 10, 1923

Docket14564

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 118 S.E. 593 (Hill v. First National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hill v. First National Bank, 118 S.E. 593, 30 Ga. App. 593, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 539 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The bill of exceptions complains of the judgment of the judge of the superior court overruling a motion to vacate and set aside a prior judgment dismissing a motion for a new trial, which motion for a new trial had been set for hearing in vacation. The motion to vacate and set aside the judgment dismissing the motion for a new trial was filed in vacation, and m vacation the judge of the superior court denied the motion to vacate and set aside the judgment. Held:

(a) The judge of the superior court has no authority to entertain a motion made in vacation to set aside a judgment of that court.

(&) The judge of the superior court being without authority to entertain the motion to set aside the judgment complained of, an affirmance of his judgment denying the motion necessarily follows. See Haskens v. State, 114 Ga. 837 (40 S. E. 997); Chapman v. State, 116 Ga. 598 (42 S. E. 999).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O’. J., and Bloodicorth, J., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI