Hill International, Inc. v. Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, Office of Disaster Recovery

Virgin Islands

Hill International, Inc. v. Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, Office of Disaster Recovery

DecidedJanuary 2, 2026

Docket3:24-cv-00049

StatusUnknown

This text of Hill International, Inc. v. Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, Office of Disaster Recovery (Hill International, Inc. v. Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, Office of Disaster Recovery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, Virgin Islands primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hill International, Inc. v. Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, Office of Disaster Recovery, (vid 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN

HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. : CIVIL ACTION : v. : No. 24-00049 : VIRGIN ISLANDS PUBLIC FINANCE : AUTHORITY, OFFICE OF DISASTER : RECOVERY :

ORDER AND NOW this 2nd day of January, 2026, upon careful and independent consideration of Plaintiff Hill International, Inc.’s Application for a Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction, Permanent Injunction, and Declaratory Relief (Dkt. No. 1-3) and the related filings thereafter, and after review of the March 12, 2025 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge G. Alan Teague, to which no party filed an objection,1 it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 88) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff Hill International, Inc.’s Application for a Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction, Permanent Injunction, and Declaratory Relief (Dkt. No. 1-3) is DENIED; and 3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mark this case as CLOSED.

1 In Magistrate Judge Teague’s Report and Recommendation, he explicitly stated “[a]ny objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed in writing within 14 days of receipt of this notice. Failure to file objections within the specified time shall bar the aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned District Court Judge.” Dkt. No. 88 at 8 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D.V.I. Loc. R. Civ. Proc. 72.3). Plaintiff Hill International, Inc. did not file any written objections to this Report and Recommendation before the 14 day deadline. Hill has therefore forfeited de novo review of this Report and Recommendation from this Court. Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (“We have held generally that failing to timely object to an R & R in a civil proceeding may result in forfeiture of de novo review at the district court level . . . .”). BY THE COURT: /s/ Juan R. Sánchez Juan R. Sánchez, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN

HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. : CIVIL ACTION : v. : No. 24-00049 : VIRGIN ISLANDS PUBLIC FINANCE : AUTHORITY, OFFICE OF DISASTER : RECOVERY :

ORDER AND NOW this 2nd day of January, 2026, upon careful and independent consideration of Plaintiff Hill International, Inc.’s Application for a Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction, Permanent Injunction, and Declaratory Relief (Dkt. No. 1-3) and the related filings thereafter, and after review of the March 12, 2025 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge G. Alan Teague, to which no party filed an objection,1 it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 88) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff Hill International, Inc.’s Application for a Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction, Permanent Injunction, and Declaratory Relief (Dkt. No. 1-3) is DENIED; and 3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mark this case as CLOSED.

1 In Magistrate Judge Teague’s Report and Recommendation, he explicitly stated “[a]ny objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed in writing within 14 days of receipt of this notice. Failure to file objections within the specified time shall bar the aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned District Court Judge.” Dkt. No. 88 at 8 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D.V.I. Loc. R. Civ. Proc. 72.3). Plaintiff Hill International, Inc. did not file any written objections to this Report and Recommendation before the 14 day deadline. Hill has therefore forfeited de novo review of this Report and Recommendation from this Court. Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (“We have held generally that failing to timely object to an R & R in a civil proceeding may result in forfeiture of de novo review at the district court level . . . .”). BY THE COURT: /s/ Juan R. Sánchez Juan R. Sánchez, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Hill International, Inc. v. Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, Office of Disaster Recovery, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-international-inc-v-virgin-islands-public-finance-authority-office-vid-2026.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack