Hill 068563 v. Arizona Department of Corrections

CourtDistrict Court, D. Arizona
DecidedApril 20, 2020
Docket2:19-cv-05693
StatusUnknown

This text of Hill 068563 v. Arizona Department of Corrections (Hill 068563 v. Arizona Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hill 068563 v. Arizona Department of Corrections, (D. Ariz. 2020).

Opinion

1 WO SC 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Isiah Romont Hill, No. CV 19-05693-PHX-JAT (CDB) 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 Arizona Department of Corrections, 13 Defendant.

14 15 On August 20, 2019, Plaintiff Isiah Romont Hill, who is in the custody of the 16 Arizona Department of Corrections (ADC), filed a “State Court Complaint” in Maricopa 17 County Superior Court case #CV 2019-004926 against several Defendants, including 18 ADC. (Doc. 1-3 at 3-6.)1 In his Complaint, Plaintiff asserted violations of his First through 19 Fourteenth Amendment rights allegedly stemming from the use of excessive force and 20 restrictions on seeing one of his children. The State of Arizona was served on October 30, 21 2019.2 On November 27, 2019, the State and ADC removed the case to this Court based 22 upon federal question subject matter jurisdiction. (Doc. 1.) 23 On December 5, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion to strike the notice of removal 24 (Doc. 4), which the Court construed as a motion to remand this case to state court. On 25

26 1 The citation refers to the document and page number generated by the Court’s 27 Case Management/Electronic Case Filing system. 28 2 Although the State of Arizona was not a named Defendant, it was served with the Complaint and noted that to the extent Plaintiff sought relief against ADC, the State was the real party in interest. 1 December 9, 2019, Plaintiff filed two notices (Docs. 5 and 6.) On December 12, 2019, 2 Defendant filed a response to Plaintiff’s motion to strike (Doc. 7). On December 18, 2019, 3 Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed (Doc. 8) and a motion to suppress (Doc. 9). On January 4 2, 2020, Plaintiff filed an objection to Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) review 5 (Doc. 10) and another notice (Doc. 11). On January 8, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion to 6 stay (Doc. 12), and on January 14, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for ruling on his motion 7 to suppress (Doc. 13). 8 In a January 28, 2020 Order, the Court overruled Plaintiff’s objection to PLRA 9 review of his Complaint,3 denied his notices to the extent that any relief was sought and 10 denied his motions (Doc. 14). The Court also dismissed the Complaint with leave to file a 11 first amended complaint because it was not filed on the court-approved form. (Id.) The 12 Court granted Plaintiff 30 days to file a first amended complaint using this Court’s 13 approved form complaint for use by prisoners. (Id.) The Court expressly warned Plaintiff 14 that failure to use the court-approved form complaint could result in an amended complaint 15 being ordered stricken. (Id. at 3-4.) 16 Plaintiff filed a motion for status seeking the status of his motion to suppress (Doc. 17 15). The Court granted the motion for status to the extent that it informed him of the status 18 of this action and his motion to suppress. Plaintiff then filed a “Motion to Strike/or 19 Impeach Submitted Notice of Judged Fact Rule 201” (Doc. 18). In this motion, Plaintiff 20 asked the Court to strike the removal of this action from the record, which the Court denied 21 (Doc. 21). 22 On February 20, 2020, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (Doc. 23) but did 23 not use the court-approved form. Plaintiff also filed a “Motion of Notice of Adjudicated 24 Fact Presented Rule of Evidence 201” (Doc. 24); a motion for entry of default judgment 25 (Doc. 26); a motion to enforce 18 U.S.C. § 2518(9) (Doc. 27); and a motion to stay (Doc. 26 28). The Court will dismiss the First Amended Complaint for failure to comply with court 27 orders by using the court-approved form and will deny the motions. The Court will grant

28 3 See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). 1 Plaintiff an additional opportunity to file an amended complaint using the court-approved 2 form. 3 I. Dismissal for Failure to Use the Court-Approved Form Complaint 4 Rule 3.4 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure requires that all complaints must be 5 filed on a court-approved form in accordance with the instructions provided with the 6 forms. The Instructions for completing the court-approved form complaint state in relevant 7 part that: 8 The form must be typed or neatly handwritten. The form must be 9 completely filled in to the extent applicable. All questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you 10 may attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard letter-sized paper. You must identify which part of the complaint 11 is being continued and number all pages. If you do not fill out the form 12 properly, you will be asked to submit additional or corrected information, which may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to cite law. 13 14 (Instructions at 1). 15 The Instructions further provide that: 16 1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the violation of only one civil right per count. 17 2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue 18 involved in your claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,” you must identify the specific issue involved. 19 3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, 20 you must state the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each individual defendant did to violate your rights. If there is 21 more than one defendant, you must identify which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which the act(s) occurred, if possible. 22 4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of 23 your rights. 24 (Instructions, part C). 25 Because Plaintiff filed this case in state court, he did not use this Court’s approved 26 form complaint for use by prisoners. In its January 28, 2020 Order, the Court dismissed 27 the Complaint with leave to file an amended complaint using the court-approved form 28 (Doc. 14). Although Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint, he did not use the court- 1 approved form. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss the First Amended Complaint for 2 failure to comply with Court Orders. The Court will grant Plaintiff an additional 3 opportunity to file an amended complaint on the court-approved form. If Plaintiff fails to 4 comply, any amended complaint may be ordered stricken or dismissed and this case 5 dismissed. 6 II. Leave to Amend 7 For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint will be dismissed 8 for failure to comply with court orders by using the court-approved form complaint for use 9 by prisoners in compliance with the Instructions. Within 30 days, Plaintiff may submit a 10 second amended complaint to cure the deficiency outlined above. The Clerk of Court will 11 mail Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a second amended complaint. If 12 Plaintiff fails to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike or dismiss the 13 second amended complaint and dismiss this action without further notice to Plaintiff. 14 Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “Second 15 Amended Complaint.” The second amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its 16 entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original 17 Complaint or First Amended Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim 18 per count. 19 A second amended complaint supersedes the original Complaint and First Amended 20 Complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hill 068563 v. Arizona Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-068563-v-arizona-department-of-corrections-azd-2020.