Hiler v. Domina

United States Court of Military Appeals

Hiler v. Domina

22 C.M.A. 655

CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals

DecidedJune 1, 1973

DocketNo. 73-27

StatusPublished

This text of 22 C.M.A. 655 (Hiler v. Domina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hiler v. Domina, 22 C.M.A. 655 (cma 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

[656]*656On consideration of the Petition for Extraordinary Relief filed in the above-entitled action, it appearing that petitioner has not sought the relief requested from the officer exercising general court-martial jurisdiction pursuant to Article 138, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 938, it is, by the Court, this 1st day of June 1973,

ORDERED:

That said petition be, and the same hereby is, dismissed.¹ Catlow v. Cooksey, 21 U.S.C.M.A. 106, 44 C.M.R. 160 (1971); Tuttle v. Commanding Officer, 21 U.S.C.M.A. 229, 45 C.M.R. 3 (1972).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[656]*656On consideration of the Petition for Extraordinary Relief filed in the above-entitled action, it appearing that petitioner has not sought the relief requested from the officer exercising general court-martial jurisdiction pursuant to Article 138, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 938, it is, by the Court, this 1st day of June 1973,

ORDERED:

That said petition be, and the same hereby is, dismissed.¹ Catlow v. Cooksey, 21 U.S.C.M.A. 106, 44 C.M.R. 160 (1971); Tuttle v. Commanding Officer, 21 U.S.C.M.A. 229, 45 C.M.R. 3 (1972).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 C.M.A. 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hiler-v-domina-cma-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack