Hiler v. Domina

22 C.M.A. 655
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided June 1, 1973·No. No. 73-27·Published

Opinion

[656]*656On consideration of the Petition for Extraordinary Relief filed in the above-entitled action, it appearing that petitioner has not sought the relief requested from the officer exercising general court-martial jurisdiction pursuant to Article 138, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 938, it is, by the Court, this 1st day of June 1973,

ORDERED:

That said petition be, and the same hereby is, dismissed.1 Catlow v. Cooksey, 21 U.S.C.M.A. 106, 44 C.M.R. 160 (1971); Tuttle v. Commanding Officer, 21 U.S.C.M.A. 229, 45 C.M.R. 3 (1972).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hiler v. Domina, 22 C.M.A. 655 (cma 1973).

22 C.M.A. 655 (Hiler v. Domina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Catlow v. Cooksey
21 C.M.A. 106 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1971)
Tuttle v. Commanding Officer
21 C.M.A. 229 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1972)