Higuera-Pineda v. Stansberry

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2007·No. 06-7854·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7854

OLIVER HIGUERA-PINEDA,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-HC-2128-H)

Submitted: February 15, 2007 Decided: February 26, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oliver Higuera-Pineda, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Oliver Higuera-Pineda, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Higuera-Pineda v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-HC-

2128-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Higuera-Pineda v. Stansberry, (4th Cir. 2007).

Higuera-Pineda v. Stansberry (Higuera-Pineda v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241