Higuera-Pineda v. Stansberry

219 F. App'x 301
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2007·No. No. 06-7854·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Oliver Higuera-Pineda, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Higuera-Pineda v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-HC2128-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Higuera-Pineda v. Stansberry, 219 F. App'x 301 (4th Cir. 2007).

219 F. App'x 301 (Higuera-Pineda v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241