Hightower v. Bigoney

156 So. 2d 509
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 25, 1963
DocketNo. 32231
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 156 So. 2d 509 (Hightower v. Bigoney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hightower v. Bigoney, 156 So. 2d 509 (Fla. 1963).

Opinion

TERRELL, Justice.

The records and briefs in this cause have been examined. The questions raised herein are the same as those raised in the companion case of Hightower v. Bigoney, Fla., 156 So.2d 501, which was consolidated with this case for purposes of review, one of said cases having been by appeal and other review by certiorari. The matter having [510]*510been disposed of by appeal, it becomes unnecessary for us to exercise jurisdiction of this cause on certiorari. Accordingly, petition for writ of certiorari heretofore issued is hereby quashed.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wincast Associates, Inc. v. Hickey
342 So. 2d 77 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 So. 2d 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hightower-v-bigoney-fla-1963.