Highlands v. Cumberland Valley Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance

52 A. 130, 203 Pa. 134, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 668
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 19, 1902
DocketAppeal, No. 402
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 52 A. 130 (Highlands v. Cumberland Valley Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Highlands v. Cumberland Valley Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance, 52 A. 130, 203 Pa. 134, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 668 (Pa. 1902).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The judgment non obstante veredicto is affirmed on the opinion of the court on the question of law reserved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rogers v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.
145 A.2d 344 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)
Roberts v. Fireman's Ins. Co. of NJ
101 A.2d 747 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1954)
National Mutual Assurance Co. v. Gardner
80 Pa. D. & C. 166 (Montour County Court of Common Pleas, 1952)
Harter v. American Eagle Fire Ins. Co.
60 F.2d 245 (Sixth Circuit, 1932)
Illinois Automobile Insurance Exchange v. Braun
124 A. 691 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Krogulski v. Northwestern National Insurance
68 Pa. Super. 47 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
Commonwealth v. Berney
66 Pa. Super. 434 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
Mahr v. Union Pac. R.
170 F. 699 (Ninth Circuit, 1909)
Highlands v. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad
58 A. 560 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 A. 130, 203 Pa. 134, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/highlands-v-cumberland-valley-farmers-mutual-fire-insurance-pa-1902.