Higgs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Higgs v. State

652 So. 2d 515, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3453, 1995 WL 144266

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 5, 1995

DocketNo. 94-614

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 652 So. 2d 515 (Higgs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Higgs v. State, 652 So. 2d 515, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3453, 1995 WL 144266 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, James Higgs, appeals from judgments of conviction and sentences for armed robbery with a firearm, false imprisonment (as a lesser included offense of kidnapping), and unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense. We affirm.

The defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on the kidnapping charge, which resulted in the conviction on the lesser included offense of false imprisonment. We disagree. In the instant case, the moving and/or confinement of the victim, Andrew Poll, was not “slight, inconsequential and merely incidental” to the commission of the robbery. Faison v. State, 426 So.2d 963 (Fla.1983); see Sanborn v. State, 513 So.2d 1380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), approved, 533 So.2d 1169 (Fla.1988).

The remaining points raised by the defendant lack merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, James Higgs, appeals from judgments of conviction and sentences for armed robbery with a firearm, false imprisonment (as a lesser included offense of kidnapping), and unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense. We affirm.

The defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on the kidnapping charge, which resulted in the conviction on the lesser included offense of false imprisonment. We disagree. In the instant case, the moving and/or confinement of the victim, Andrew Poll, was not “slight, inconsequential and merely incidental” to the commission of the robbery. Faison v. State, 426 So.2d 963 (Fla.1983); see Sanborn v. State, 513 So.2d 1380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), approved, 533 So.2d 1169 (Fla.1988).

The remaining points raised by the defendant lack merit.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

652 So. 2d 515, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3453, 1995 WL 144266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higgs-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack