Higgs v. State

601 So. 2d 319, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7952, 1992 WL 171379
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Higgs v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5798
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 24, 1992·No. No. 92-570·Published

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

In this habeas corpus proceeding we appointed the trial judge as commissioner to determine whether under the mailbox rule1 petitioner timely appealed an order summarily denying his 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. See Higgs v. State, 599 So.2d 274 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). The trial court found that petitioner’s 3.850 motion was denied August 1, 1990, and his timely motion for rehearing was denied August 20, 1990. The court further found' that petitioner’s notice of appeal was postmarked September 19, 1990 and filed in the clerk’s office September 26, 1990. Applying the mailbox rule, the recorded date on the envelope indicates that petitioner timely placed the notice of appeal in the hands of the prison officials for mailing within the applicable thirty day period. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.850. Based on these findings, we treat the instant petition as a petition for writ of mandamus and direct the circuit court clerk of the fifth judicial circuit to transmit to this court the record in the 3.850 appeal as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(g).

PETITION GRANTED.

GOSHORN, C.J. and GRIFFIN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Higgs v. State, 601 So. 2d 319, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7952, 1992 WL 171379 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

601 So. 2d 319 (Higgs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haag v. State
591 So. 2d 614 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Higgs v. State
599 So. 2d 274 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)