Higgins v. Higgins
347 So. 2d 630, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 22692
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Higgins v. Higgins. Read the opinion of the Court — 348 So. 2d 48 →
Opinion
Affirmed. Pierson v. Sharp, 283 So.2d 880 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973); Schmidt v. Reyes, 274 So.2d 242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973); Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. King, 207 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); Johnson v. Eatonville, 203 So.2d 664 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967); Davis v. Zona, 198 So.2d 43 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967); Best v. Barnette, 130 So.2d 90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961); Broward County Port Authority v. F. M. Rule & Co., 119 So.2d 82 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Higgins v. Higgins, 347 So. 2d 630, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 22692 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).
347 So. 2d 630 (Higgins v. Higgins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Broward County Port Authority v. FM Rule & Co.
119 So. 2d 82 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. King
207 So. 2d 294 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Best v. Barnette
130 So. 2d 90 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Johnson v. Town of Eatonville
203 So. 2d 664 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Pierson v. Sharp
283 So. 2d 880 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Davis ex rel. Davis v. Zona
198 So. 2d 43 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Schmidt v. Reyes
274 So. 2d 242 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)