Davis ex rel. Davis v. Zona

198 So. 2d 43, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4726
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 19, 1967·No. No. 7169·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellant, plaintiff below, appeals from a final judgment entered on a jury [44] verdict in favor of appellees, defendants below.

Appellant alleges prejudicial error in the ruling by the trial court at the pretrial conference that each side of the case would be limited to three peremptory challenges.

Appellees have moved to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the record before this court does not include the judicial act sought to be reviewed. Upon examination, we find that the original record1 does not contain a reported transcript of the pre-trial conference or a pretrial order. The rule is well settled that when relief is sought on appeal the appellant must provide the court with an adequate record for review. Morceau v. Meader, 179 So.2d 242 (D.C.A.Fla.1965), Gleim v. Gleim, 176 So.2d 610 (D.C.A.Fla. 1965). Finding no basis in the record upon which to consider the merits of this appeal, the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.

SHANNON, Acting C. J., and LILES and HOBSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis ex rel. Davis v. Zona, 198 So. 2d 43, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4726 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

198 So. 2d 43 (Davis ex rel. Davis v. Zona) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harbour Watch Homeowners Ass'n v. Derderian
618 So. 2d 315 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Higgins v. Higgins
347 So. 2d 630 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Orange Julius Realty Co. v. Sunshine Toy Center, Inc.
251 So. 2d 681 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)