Higgins v. Childs

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Higgins v. Childs

13 Misc. 2d 442, 176 N.Y.S.2d 73

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 5, 1958

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 Misc. 2d 442 (Higgins v. Childs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Higgins v. Childs, 13 Misc. 2d 442, 176 N.Y.S.2d 73 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court having failed to specify the grounds on which the motion for a new trial was made and the grounds on which it was decided, the order granting a new trial did not comply with rule 224 of the Rules of Civil Practice and must be reversed (Magee v. Rifkind, 153 N. Y. S. 2d 731).

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion denied.

Concur — Hofstadter, J. P., Hecht and Tilzer, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI