Higgins v. Childs
13 Misc. 2d 442, 176 N.Y.S.2d 73
Opinion
The court having failed to specify the grounds on which the motion for a new trial was made and the grounds on which it was decided, the order granting a new trial did not comply with rule 224 of the Rules of Civil Practice and must be reversed (Magee v. Rifkind, 153 N. Y. S. 2d 731).
The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion denied.
Concur — Hofstadter, J. P., Hecht and Tilzer, JJ.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Higgins v. Childs, 13 Misc. 2d 442, 176 N.Y.S.2d 73 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).
13 Misc. 2d 442 (Higgins v. Childs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hall v. City of New York
25 Misc. 2d 1084 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)