Higgins v. Andrews

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Higgins v. Andrews

121 Mass. 293, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 357

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedNovember 10, 1876

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 121 Mass. 293 (Higgins v. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Higgins v. Andrews, 121 Mass. 293, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 357 (Mass. 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

The order of proof was in the discretion of the court. The evidence objected to does not appear to have been admitted for any other purpose than to show that the plaintiff had money which he might have lent to the defendants. If the defendants denied that the plaintiff had such money, this evidence was competent. If not, it was immaterial. The bill of exceptions does not show that the defendants could have been prejudiced by its admission. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

The order of proof was in the discretion of the court. The evidence objected to does not appear to have been admitted for any other purpose than to show that the plaintiff had money which he might have lent to the defendants. If the defendants denied that the plaintiff had such money, this evidence was competent. If not, it was immaterial. The bill of exceptions does not show that the defendants could have been prejudiced by its admission. Exceptions overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 Mass. 293, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/higgins-v-andrews-mass-1876.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack