Higginbotham v. Jackson

869 P.2d 319, 1994 WL 66913
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided February 22, 1994·No. 82567·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Original jurisdiction is assumed. Writ issued prohibiting Niles Jackson, District Judge, Oklahoma County, or any other assigned Judge from enforcing the order filed November 10, 1993 in Cause No. CJ-93-6324-65 on the docket of the District Court, Oklahoma County, styled Johnny Higginbotham, et al. v. Cox Cable of Oklahoma City, Inc. There is no statutory discovery method contained in the Oklahoma Discovery Code that requires a plaintiff in a personal injury lawsuit to execute in favor of the defendant a general medical authorization entitling defendant to obtain all of plaintiffs medical records. 12 O.S. § 2503(D)(3) qualifies the physician/patient privilege “to the extent that an adverse party in said proceeding may obtain relevant information regarding said condition by statutory discovery.” 76 O.S.1991 § 19(B) applies only to medical malpractice plaintiffs.

/s/ Ralph B. Hodges Chief Justice

LAVENDER, V.C.J., and HARGRAVE, OPALA, ALMA WILSON, KAUGER, SUMMERS and WATT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Higginbotham v. Jackson, 869 P.2d 319, 1994 WL 66913 (Okla. 1994).

869 P.2d 319 (Higginbotham v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holmes v. Nightingale
2007 OK 15 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2007)
Ellis v. Gurich
2003 OK 47 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2003)
Thomas v. Four Seasons Nursing Centers, Inc.
206 F.R.D. 294 (N.D. Oklahoma, 2002)
Brown v. Blevins
1998 OK 104 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1998)