Hidalgo v. WCBS-TV

2023 NY Slip Op 05789
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 16, 2023
DocketIndex No. 802361/21E Appeal No. 1031 Case No. 2022-03118
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2023 NY Slip Op 05789 (Hidalgo v. WCBS-TV) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hidalgo v. WCBS-TV, 2023 NY Slip Op 05789 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Hidalgo v WCBS-TV (2023 NY Slip Op 05789)
Hidalgo v WCBS-TV
2023 NY Slip Op 05789
Decided on November 16, 2023
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: November 16, 2023
Before: Renwick, P.J., Kern, Gesmer, Shulman, O'Neill Levy, JJ.

Index No. 802361/21E Appeal No. 1031 Case No. 2022-03118

[*1]Daurin D. Hidalgo et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v

WCBS-TV, Defendant-Respondent, John Doe, Defendant.


Mitchell Dranow, Sea Cliff, for appellants.

Newman Law Associates PLLC, New York (Gregory Bakos of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ben R. Barbato, J.), entered on July 12, 2022, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant WCBS-TV's CPLR 3211(a)(7) motion to dismiss, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

WCBS-NY submitted unrefuted evidence establishing that the van involved in the accident had been stolen, thereby rebutting the presumption that it was being operated with its consent (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 [1]; Alvarez v Bivens, 114 AD3d 526 [1st Dept 2014]). In opposition, plaintiffs failed to raise an issue of fact as to whether WCBS-NY had violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1210 (a).

Plaintiffs' argument that WCBS-TV's evidence was inadmissible is unpreserved and we decline to consider it.

We have considered plaintiffs' remaining arguments, including that WCBS-TV's

motion was premature, and find them unavailing. THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: November 16, 2023



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hidalgo v. WCBS-TV
2023 NY Slip Op 05789 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2023 NY Slip Op 05789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hidalgo-v-wcbs-tv-nyappdiv-2023.