Hicks v. Mid-Florida Production Credit Ass'n

374 So. 2d 566, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15426
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 7, 1979·No. No. MM-162·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The lower tribunal rendered an order of foreclosure, holding that foreclosure of a non-purchase money mortgage on Florida homestead property is not a forced sale and therefore does not violate Article X, Section 4(a), Fla.Const. We affirm. Hart v. Sanderson’s Administrators, 18 Fla. 103 (1881).

MILLS, C. J., and ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hicks v. Mid-Florida Production Credit Ass'n, 374 So. 2d 566, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15426 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

374 So. 2d 566 (Hicks v. Mid-Florida Production Credit Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pirolo v. Century First National Bank of Pinellas County
450 So. 2d 875 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Felton v. Citizens Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
679 P.2d 928 (Washington Supreme Court, 1984)
McElwain Associates, Inc. v. Culbreth
417 So. 2d 838 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Hicks v. MID-FLORIDA PROD. CREDIT ASS'N
374 So. 2d 566 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)