Hicks v. MID-FLORIDA PROD. CREDIT ASS'N

374 So. 2d 566
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 7, 1979·No. MM-162·Published

Opinion

374 So.2d 566 (1979)

Jack C. HICKS, Jr., and Erma L. Hicks, His Wife, Appellants,
v.
MID-FLORIDA PRODUCTION CREDIT ASSOCIATION, a Corporation Organized and Existing under the Laws of the United States of America, Appellee.

No. MM-162.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 7, 1979.

*567 J. Michael Davis of the Law Offices of Lansing J. Roy, Gainesville, for appellants.

Bevin G. Ritch of Lowry & Ritch, Gainesville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The lower tribunal rendered an order of foreclosure, holding that foreclosure of a non-purchase money mortgage on Florida homestead property is not a forced sale and therefore does not violate Article X, Section 4(a), Fla. Const. We affirm. Hart v. Sanderson's Administrators, 18 Fla. 103 (1881).

MILLS, C.J., and ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hicks v. MID-FLORIDA PROD. CREDIT ASS'N, 374 So. 2d 566 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

374 So. 2d 566 (Hicks v. MID-FLORIDA PROD. CREDIT ASS'N) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hart v. Sanderson's Administrators
18 Fla. 103 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1881)
Hicks v. Mid-Florida Production Credit Ass'n
374 So. 2d 566 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)