Hicks v. MID-FLORIDA PROD. CREDIT ASS'N
This text of 374 So. 2d 566 (Hicks v. MID-FLORIDA PROD. CREDIT ASS'N) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jack C. HICKS, Jr., and Erma L. Hicks, His Wife, Appellants,
v.
MID-FLORIDA PRODUCTION CREDIT ASSOCIATION, a Corporation Organized and Existing under the Laws of the United States of America, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
*567 J. Michael Davis of the Law Offices of Lansing J. Roy, Gainesville, for appellants.
Bevin G. Ritch of Lowry & Ritch, Gainesville, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The lower tribunal rendered an order of foreclosure, holding that foreclosure of a non-purchase money mortgage on Florida homestead property is not a forced sale and therefore does not violate Article X, Section 4(a), Fla. Const. We affirm. Hart v. Sanderson's Administrators, 18 Fla. 103 (1881).
MILLS, C.J., and ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
374 So. 2d 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-mid-florida-prod-credit-assn-fladistctapp-1979.