Hicks v. Hicks

130 So. 3d 194, 2013 WL 2367564, 2013 Ala. LEXIS 56
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 31, 2013
Docket1120227
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 130 So. 3d 194 (Hicks v. Hicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hicks v. Hicks, 130 So. 3d 194, 2013 WL 2367564, 2013 Ala. LEXIS 56 (Ala. 2013).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

STUART, BOLIN, PARKER, MURDOCK, MAIN, and WISE, JJ., concur. SHAW, J., concurs specially. [195]*195MOORE, C.J., dissents. BRYAN, J., recuses himself.*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arrington v. Courtyard Citiflats, LLC
191 So. 3d 787 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2015)
Hudson v. Hudson
178 So. 3d 861 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 So. 3d 194, 2013 WL 2367564, 2013 Ala. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-hicks-ala-2013.