Hicks v. Hicks

Supreme Court of Alabama

Hicks v. Hicks

130 So. 3d 194, 2013 WL 2367564, 2013 Ala. LEXIS 56

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided May 31, 2013·No. 1120227·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

STUART, BOLIN, PARKER, MURDOCK, MAIN, and WISE, JJ., concur. SHAW, J., concurs specially. [195] MOORE, C.J., dissents. BRYAN, J., recuses himself.*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

STUART, BOLIN, PARKER, MURDOCK, MAIN, and WISE, JJ., concur. SHAW, J., concurs specially. [195] MOORE, C.J., dissents. BRYAN, J., recuses himself.*

Hicks v. Hicks, 130 So. 3d 194, 2013 WL 2367564, 2013 Ala. LEXIS 56 (Ala. 2013).

Pincite

130 So. 3d 194 (Hicks v. Hicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related