Hicks v. Fred Meyer, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Hicks v. Fred Meyer, Inc.

643 P.2d 1311, 58 Or. App. 18

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJune 23, 1982

DocketNo. 79-00920, CA A21996

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 643 P.2d 1311 (Hicks v. Fred Meyer, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hicks v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 643 P.2d 1311, 58 Or. App. 18 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

RICHARDSON, P. J.

Employer and its compensation insurance carrier petitioned for reconsideration of our decision. They do not contend the result is wrong but point out that we misstated the factual basis of the decision in Wilson v. SAIF, 48 Or App 993, 618 P2d 473 (1980), in discussing that case. They are correct. The opinion presently reads in part:

“In Wilson, the carrier acted unilaterally by deducting the amount of overpayment from the compensation awarded by the determination order. * * *” 57 Or App at 70.

The sentence is modified to read as follows:

“In Wilson, the carrier acted unilaterally by deducting the amount of overpayment from the compensation awarded by the referee after a hearing. * * *”

The petition for reconsideration is granted, and the opinion, as modified, is adhered to.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI