Hicks v. Fraser Clinic

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hicks v. Fraser Clinic

169 A.D.2d 560, 565 N.Y.S.2d 703, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 524

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 24, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 169 A.D.2d 560 (Hicks v. Fraser Clinic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hicks v. Fraser Clinic, 169 A.D.2d 560, 565 N.Y.S.2d 703, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 524 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Herbert Shapiro, J.), entered on or about April 24, 1990, denying the extrajudicial request of defendant Ronald Fraser Clinic to refer plaintiffs claims against defendant New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation to a medical malpractice panel pursuant to Judiciary Law § 148-a and section 636.1 of the Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department (22 NYCRR 636.1), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There is an insufficient basis, upon the record before this court, to determine that the IAS court abused its discretion, as a matter of law. Accordingly, the order is affirmed. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Herbert Shapiro, J.), entered on or about April 24, 1990, denying the extrajudicial request of defendant Ronald Fraser Clinic to refer plaintiffs claims against defendant New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation to a medical malpractice panel pursuant to Judiciary Law § 148-a and section 636.1 of the Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department (22 NYCRR 636.1), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There is an insufficient basis, upon the record before this court, to determine that the IAS court abused its discretion, as a matter of law. Accordingly, the order is affirmed. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 A.D.2d 560, 565 N.Y.S.2d 703, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicks-v-fraser-clinic-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack