Hicks v. City of New York
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.), entered September 24, 2002, which denied petitioners’ joint application brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondents’ determination dismissing petitioners from their employment as probationary police officers and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Respondents properly dismissed petitioners from their probationary employment when reliable drug tests established that they had used cocaine, and we find no evidence of bad faith or illegality (see Matter of Johnson v Katz, 68 NY2d 649 [1986]; Matter of Brown v City of New York, 250 AD2d 546 [1998]). Petitioners’ arguments concerning alleged disparate treatment of a probationary officer claimed to be similarly situated to petitioners are unsupported by the record. Concur—Nardelli, J.P, Tom, Mazzarelli and Marlow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1 A.D.3d 218 (Hicks v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.