Hickman v. Federal Trade Commission

• Court: District Court, District of Columbia
• Decided: June 10, 2009
• Docket: Civil Action No. 2009-1071
• Status: Published

Opinion

FILED

JUN l 0 2009 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FoR THE DISTRICT oF CoLUMBIA C";;';sé;icttand ur s ) Derian Douglas Hickman, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v_ ) Civil Action No.

) 09 1071 Federal TradeCommission, ) ) Defendant. ) )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff s pro se complaint and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis The Court will grant the in forma pauperis application and dismiss the case because the complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading requirements of Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. l987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires complaints to contain " (l) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction [and] (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." Fed. R. Civ. P. S(a); see Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 66l, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). The Rule 8 standard ensures that defendants receive fair notice of the claim being asserted so that they can prepare a responsive answer and an adequate defense and determine whether the doctrine of res

judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. l977).

Plaintiff, a District of Columbia resident, sues the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC")

but he does not allege any wrongdoing Rather, plaintiff seeks review of this Court’s previous

dismissals of his cases and requests seemingly unrelated information. Because the complaint fails to provide any notice of a claim against the FTC, it will be dismissed by separate Order issued contemporaneously.

H@Q?»vt/`

United Statés£i_s§ct Judge

Date: June b , 2009