HEYWARD v. GARVIN

E.D. Pennsylvania

HEYWARD v. GARVIN

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania·Decided May 11, 2021·No. 2:20-cv-06098·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DAIVON HEYWARD : CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 20-6098 GARVIN, et al.

ORDER AND NOW, this 11" day of May 2021, upon careful consideration of the Petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF Doc. No. 1), the Response (ECF Doc. No. 8), no timely reply, and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED: 1. We DENY and DISMISS the Petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF Doc. No. 1) with prejudice; 2. We DENY a certificate of appealability;' and, 3. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.

' See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DAIVON HEYWARD : CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 20-6098 GARVIN, et al.

ORDER AND NOW, this 11" day of May 2021, upon careful consideration of the Petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF Doc. No. 1), the Response (ECF Doc. No. 8), no timely reply, and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED: 1. We DENY and DISMISS the Petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF Doc. No. 1) with prejudice; 2. We DENY a certificate of appealability;' and, 3. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.

' See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

HEYWARD v. GARVIN, (E.D. Pa. 2021).

Pincite

HEYWARD v. GARVIN (HEYWARD v. GARVIN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related