Herzell v. Smith

246 A.D. 770

Opinion

Judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant, a dentist, for malpractice, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herzell v. Smith, 246 A.D. 770 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

246 A.D. 770 (Herzell v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.