Herzell v. Smith
238 A.D. 791
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1933
StatusPublished
This text of 238 A.D. 791 (Herzell v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Herzell v. Smith, 238 A.D. 791 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper and Carswell, JJ., concur; Seudder and Davis, JJ., dissent on the ground that there was an issue of fact which should have been submitted to the jury.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
238 A.D. 791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herzell-v-smith-nyappdiv-1933.