Herrmann v. Rogers

Supreme Court

Herrmann v. Rogers

358 U.S. 332, 79 S. Ct. 353, 3 L. Ed. 2d 345, 1959 U.S. LEXIS 1610

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 26, 1959·No. 572·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to it, to consider whether, under the law of property of Idaho, it was possible, after the time of the making of the conveyance, for any person other than the named beneficiaries of the trust to acquire a property interest in it (other than through a named beneficiary), and, in the light of its determination as to this, to reconsider its holding that respondent was entitled to all the trust funds remaining in the hands of the trustee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to it, to consider whether, under the law of property of Idaho, it was possible, after the time of the making of the conveyance, for any person other than the named beneficiaries of the trust to acquire a property interest in it (other than through a named beneficiary), and, in the light of its determination as to this, to reconsider its holding that respondent was entitled to all the trust funds remaining in the hands of the trustee.

Herrmann v. Rogers, 358 U.S. 332, 79 S. Ct. 353, 3 L. Ed. 2d 345, 1959 U.S. LEXIS 1610 (1959).

Pincite

358 U.S. 332 (Herrmann v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.