Herrly v. Muzik
362 N.W.2d 335, 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1115
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Herrly v. Muzik. Read the opinion of the Court — 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1194 →
Opinion
ORDER
Prior report: 355 N.W.2d 452.
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Floyd A. Eastlund and Edghar J. Paine for further review of the decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is, granted. Briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ.App. P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Herrly v. Muzik, 362 N.W.2d 335, 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1115 (Mich. 1985).
362 N.W.2d 335 (Herrly v. Muzik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Herrly v. Muzik
355 N.W.2d 452 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1984)