Herring v. Richmond Medical Center for Women
This text of 127 S. Ct. 2094 (Herring v. Richmond Medical Center for Women) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Michael HERRING, in His Official Capacity as Commonwealth's Attorney for the City of Richmond, Virginia, et al., petitioners,
v.
RICHMOND MEDICAL CENTER FOR WOMEN, et al.
Supreme Court of United States.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 1610, 167 L.Ed.2d 480 (2007).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 S. Ct. 2094, 550 U.S. 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herring-v-richmond-medical-center-for-women-scotus-2007.