Herring v. Herring

222 S.E.2d 331, 236 Ga. 43
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 6, 1976
Docket30304, 30305, 30397, 30398
StatusPublished
Cited by30 cases

This text of 222 S.E.2d 331 (Herring v. Herring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Herring v. Herring, 222 S.E.2d 331, 236 Ga. 43 (Ga. 1976).

Opinions

Per curiam.

These four appeals grow out of continuing litigation between the parties in a domestic relations case. Prior appeals in the case are reported in 232 Ga. 464 (207 SE2d 452) (1974), 233 Ga. 484 (211 SE2d 893) (1975), and 234 Ga. 539 (216 SE2d 833) (1975).

1. The appeal in No. 30304 is from an order of the Cobb Superior Court issued April 10, 1975, which found William Herring in contempt for failure to pay $75 per [44]*44month child support as required by its earlier order of March 7, 1974 (affirmed in 234 Ga. 539, supra), and ordered that he be incarcerated unless he purge himself of contempt. He paid $1,019.20 ($75 per month plus the statutory interest) to Dorothy Herring, thereby purging himself, and the court released and dismissed him from the contempt order. He appeals.

Code Ann. § 6-701 provides for appellate court review of judgments and rulings of lower courts. It provides further that "Nothing in this paragraph shall require the appellate court to pass upon questions which are rendered moot.” See Also Code Ann. § 6-809 (b) (3).

This court has held that where a litigant is found to be in contempt of court and is ordered held in jail, his appeal of that order becomes moot upon his release from jail. Cagle v. PMC Development Co., 233 Ga. 583 (212 SE2d 765) (1975). The rule is the same where the litigant complies with the order of contempt by payment of the amount required. Gabriel v. Gabriel, 219 Ga. 290 (133 SE2d 25) (1963), and cits.

Here William Herring has paid the amount required, thus purging himself of contempt, and the appeal in No. 30304 is dismissed as moot.

2. The appeal in No. 30397 is from a later order of the trial court entered July 11, 1975, which again found William Herring in contempt for failure to make child support payments. This order included $150 for attorney fees. Again, William Herring paid the amount, thereby purging himself of contempt. The rule of law expressed in Division l’ is applicable and controlling here. Number 30397 is therefore dismissed as moot.

3. Number 30398 is an appeal by William Herring from an order entered July 11, 1975, finding him in contempt for refusing to pay attorney fees as previously ordered by that court on February 20, 1975. William Herring again purged himself of contempt by paying the required $1,000 attorney fees. Number 30398 is dismissed as moot.

4. In No. 30305, Dorothy Herring cross appeals from the order of April 10,1975, on the ground that she was not awarded attorney fees as is provided for in Code Ann. § 30-219.

[45]*4530304, 30305, Submitted September 19, 1975 30397, 30398, Submitted October 3,1975 Decided January 6, 1976 Rehearing denied January 27, 1976. William F. Herring, pro se. Aynes, Burger, Genius & Kirby, Richard R. Kirby, for appellee.

By motion filed February 4, 1975, Dorothy Herring moved to have her former husband held in contempt and moved for attorney fees in the sum of $1,000. By order dated February 20, 1975, the court awarded $1,000 in attorney fees as expense of requiring William Herring to answer interrogatories, and by order dated April 10,1975, held him in contempt for nonpayment of child support. Under these facts, we cannot find that the trial court erred in not awarding attorney fees in its order of April 10,1975.

Numbers 30397, 30398 and 30304 are dismissed. Number 30305 is affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Hill, J., who concurs specially, and Ingram, J., who dissents from Division 4, and Hall, J., who dissents from Divisions 1, 2 and 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jamison Onis Corley v. Kimberly Marie Jackson
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2022
Bramble v. Bramble
303 Neb. 380 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2019)
MONDY v. MAGNOLIA ADVANCED MATERIALS, INC
303 Ga. 764 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)
Lorenzo Hammonds v. Eden Parks
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012
Hammonds v. Parks
735 S.E.2d 801 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)
Johnson v. State
702 S.E.2d 920 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2010)
In Re Hughes
681 S.E.2d 745 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2009)
In Re Hatfield
658 S.E.2d 871 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Chappell v. Chappell
318 S.E.2d 590 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1984)
Herring v. Herring
223 S.E.2d 676 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
222 S.E.2d 331, 236 Ga. 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herring-v-herring-ga-1976.