Herring v. Herring

Supreme Court of Georgia

Herring v. Herring

186 S.E.2d 538, 228 Ga. 492, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 604

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedDecember 1, 1971

Docket26840

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 186 S.E.2d 538 (Herring v. Herring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herring v. Herring, 186 S.E.2d 538, 228 Ga. 492, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 604 (Ga. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Undercofler, Justice.

This appeal is from an or<jer of the Newton Superior Court denying the appellant’s application to be purged of contempt and released from impris *493 onment for nonpayment of alimony and child support.

Argued November 9, 1971 Decided December 1, 1971 Rehearing denied December 17, 1971. Robert W. Allen, for appellant. Campbell & Campbell, R. P. Campbell, W. K. Campbell, for appellee.

The record contains a "Stipulation of Counsel” as to the facts but is signed only by counsel for the appellant. The trial judge noted on the "stipulation” that he did not remember the evidence in detail. The questions presented by this appeal require a consideration of the evidence. Since the evidence has not been brought to this court by any of the methods provided in Code Ann. § 6-805, no question involving the evidence can be considered by this court. Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 24; Webb v. Jones, 221 Ga. 754 (4) (146 SE2d 910).

All of the other questions in this case are moot and need not be decided.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Undercofler, Justice.

This appeal is from an or<jer of the Newton Superior Court denying the appellant’s application to be purged of contempt and released from impris *493 onment for nonpayment of alimony and child support.

Argued November 9, 1971 Decided December 1, 1971 Rehearing denied December 17, 1971. Robert W. Allen, for appellant. Campbell & Campbell, R. P. Campbell, W. K. Campbell, for appellee.

The record contains a "Stipulation of Counsel” as to the facts but is signed only by counsel for the appellant. The trial judge noted on the "stipulation” that he did not remember the evidence in detail. The questions presented by this appeal require a consideration of the evidence. Since the evidence has not been brought to this court by any of the methods provided in Code Ann. § 6-805, no question involving the evidence can be considered by this court. Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 24; Webb v. Jones, 221 Ga. 754 (4) (146 SE2d 910).

All of the other questions in this case are moot and need not be decided.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 S.E.2d 538, 228 Ga. 492, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herring-v-herring-ga-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack