Bowen v. State
This text of 259 S.E.2d 169 (Bowen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Bowen was found guilty in the Superior Court of Floyd County of homicide by vehicle. He appeals, and enumerates three errors. First, that the trial court erred in not granting him a new trial; second, that the trial court erred in not granting his motion for acquittal; and third, that the verdict is contrary to the evidence, and without evidence to support it.
All enumerations of error require a review of the transcript for determination of the merits of the errors enumerated by Bowen. For reasons unknown to this court there is no transcript, nor is there a summary of the transcript or stipulation of facts in accordance with Code Ann. §§ 6-805 (g) and 6-805 (i). The transcript of the trial not having been filed and transmitted to this court, there is no question presented by this appeal upon which this court can pass. Dunaway v. Beam, 129 Ga. App. 220, 221 (199 SE2d 395) (1973); Herring v. Herring, 228 Ga. 492 (186 SE2d 538) (1971). "Error must be shown by the record. It cannot be demonstrated ... by assertions in the brief of counsel which are unsupported in the record.” [167]*167Maloy v. Dixon, 127 Ga. App. 151 (1) (b) (193 SE2d 19) (1972).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 S.E.2d 169, 151 Ga. App. 166, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowen-v-state-gactapp-1979.